![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 2 088 08/09 MINUTES OF THE HIGHWAYS COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY 23rd SEPTEMBER 2008
Present: Cllr Winney Cllr Morgan Cllr Dowler Cllr Cusack
H23 Declarations of Interest: None declared
H24 To confirm the Minutes of Previous Meeting held on 22nd July 2008
H25 Review of Matters Arising from Previous minutes o The resident has not been informed about the view that there is sufficient space for dog training on Sat mornings ACTION: The Clerk to write to resident ACTION: The Clerk to discuss with County Highways As Rev Atkinson had been delayed, it was resolved to bring forward item H27
H27 To review Rules and Regulations for Burial Ground Rev Atkinson arrived
CHURCHYARDH26 To continue discussion on St Mary’s Churchyard It appears that the available burial space in the Garden section of the Churchyard was not fully utilised before burials were started in the New Burial Ground. It is not clear as to why this happened as there appears to be no paperwork covering the history of this area.
It has been established that:
It is not clear whether the ‘North’ section referred to by the Secretary of State also includes the Garden section and whether the Garden section has been consecrated. The North section has had burials all over the area but some headstones were subsequently removed or relocated. The possibility of utilising the available space in the Garden section (approx 80 plots) needs to be discussed at the next PCC meeting. It was suggested the boundary between the North and Garden sections could be reinforced with additional planting to screen new memorials from the older part of the Churchyard.
089 08/09 The committee advised Rev Atkinson that it thought that if there was space in the Churchyard and the Church chose not to use it, the onus should be on the Church to provide an alternative location for burials. It was agreed by all concerned that there should not be any further burials in the North section even if space allows. FTC is still responsible for maintenance of the Original Churchyard. It seems that the maintenance costs for the North section are the responsibility of the PCC and not FTC. The situation regarding the Garden section is not clear but Rev Atkinson advised that the PCC would be hard pushed to find sufficient finance to cover the costs. Legally if a Churchyard is not Closed, the Parish Council can still help financially. Rev Atkinson advised of his next actions with respect to this situation: The next PCC meeting is on 8th October and Rev Atkinson was asked to contact the Council Office as soon as he has any answers but at the latest by the next Highways meeting on 25th November 2008. If information is forthcoming before this, an extraordinary meeting can be arranged. Rev Atkinson left the meeting It was agreed to recommend to Full Council to still continue with the purchase of land previously offered for burials.
HIGHWAYSH28 To receive income and expenditure for Highways committee The figures were discussed and the committee was aware that there are some budgets not utilised.
H29 To review lighting of Horcott paths project
H30 To discuss suggestions by Planning committee (ref mins 19th August) for improvements to London Road near Victory Villas
H31 Correspondence received
090 08/09 iii. GCC response ref HGV Management Zone: County Cllr Theodoulou is following this up.
FOOTPATHS
H32 To decide whether a survey of all Fairford Footpaths is required
|
||||||||






